You can view the video in my last post and read his commentary immediately below it,
here.
Well here goes...
"The Tropaion cross symbol was sacred to the ancient Romans. Sport trophies today came from this symbol of victory. Notice the prisoners bound at the base for they are the losers captured in battle."
True enough. The lower part this Roman cameo, the Gemma Augustaea, shows a team of soldiers erecting one. And the prisoners are shown bound and on the ground beneath. Also, Early Christian writers like Minucius Felix (
Octavius 29) and Justin Martyr (
I Apology 55) noted that the Romans used crosses for their military standards, banners, tropaions and even used a cross to consecrate the wax images of the deified deceased Caesars on display during their funerals!
"After a victorious battle a triumph ceremony was held for tribute to Victoria. Victoria was a lady spirit with wings that grants victory in battle."
Rob definitely got this from
Calpurnpiso. I don't know where he got the information from, but the
Wikipedia article states that after a battle, the victors set up a tropaion and dedicated it to a god or goddess in thanksgiving for the victory.
"The tropaion [Greek: τρόπαιον, Latin: tropaeum], was a stick decorated with empty armor to mimic a warrior. The divine spirits (Latin spiritus: breath, air) would fill the armor."
Here the tropaion appears more like a cross to me. And
again, it is
Calpurnpiso who said the empty space was filled with
spiritus (air).
"The enemy prisoners, and their armor, were placed at the base of the trophy. Wood was important for siege weapons than for execution."
The first sentence is true enough, but the second one I find to be unfounded. Josephus wrote in his
Jewish War (
5.446-451) that the soldiers nailed so many prisoners to
crosses [execution poles] that there was not enough room for the
crosses and not enough
crosses for the bodies. Why would the soldiers nail the prisoners up to these poles, if they did not use wood for execution?
"The cross symbol represented the life giving rays of the sun, and was reserved for divinity. To put a prisoner on it would be a sacrilege."
It depends on how the
cross was made. A
crux commissa (usually refers to a T-shaped cross but could also mean a thrown-together [1] execution pole with crossarm), sure. But a
crux immissa (inlaid cross [
2])? Very unlikely, for that was the cross that Romans held sacred. One such cross was placed on top of the Temple of Divus Iulius (Divine Julius [Caesar]), according to some ancient Roman coins.
"The symbology in coins, statues, wall reliefs, etc., is very clear as to the purpose and sacredness of the cross to the superstitious Romans."
True. There are examples on wall reliefs, such as the exterior of Trajan's Column (image noted above), on the Triumphal Arches of Titus and Constantine where winged female figures hold aloft
tropaea, crosses each dressed with a figure. And many Roman coins, such as most of the coins in Rob's video show, of course, victory crosses.
"The earliest symbology of crucifixion I can find is on the Colosseum, and that is most likely from the 6th century church that was built inside the stone-robbed structure. If you do the proper research for evidence of pre-Nicean Creed crucifixion you will come to the Dionysus, Bacchus, Caesar wax effigy controversy. Tropaion = sacred [cross]."
Actually the "symbology," or image, in the Colosseum appears that it might have been original to the construction, as viewed in the photo images,
here. It shows three persons alrleady suspended, with executioners nailing a fourth. Below is a detail.
|
Depiction of a quadruple execution -- The Colosseum, Rome. |
Now the Dionysus / Bacchus / Caesar wax effigy controversy is discussed
here. Usually the Orpheos pendant is dismissed as an 18th Century forgery, but it appears to have been a genuine 3rd or 4th century artifact that was associated with a Bacchic cult and the imagery possibly derived from the exhibition of the funerary wax image of Julius Caesar. [3]
"Ask any nusmiatists [sic]
, or coin collector, and they will tell you that money is a historical document to the society that minted it. That is why I mainly used [ancient coins]."
No argument there.
"The head bust of the women that you see on the head side of the coin is the Goddess Venus with the life giving sun cross in her ear (sacred)."
True enough. But such images are not as frequent as Rob would like to believe, unfortunately. Out of several images made with an internet search I found two showing a T-cross dangling from Venus' ear.
|
Cornelius Sulla Silver Denarius Rome 56BC Venus Three Trophies (ebay.com) |
"The Goddess Venus was the celestial mother to Julius Caesar. Julius was an anointed with oil Christos (title) to Venus. Christos is Greek for annointed with oil (Christ). The Roman clergy spoke/wrote Greek while the commoners used Latin. Like the Greeks they personified everything."
Actually, Julius Caesar claimed
descent from Iulius, son of Aeneas who was considered the son of Venus. It is not known whether Julius Caesar was actually anointed with oil. Francesco Carotta claims that as a title,
Christos is abbreviated from
Archieros Megistos (Greek for Highest Priest, or the latin equivalent
Pontifex Maximus, a title held by the Popes today) [4]. But Rob is correct on
christos being
Greek for "anointed with oil" and even for the oil itself, as well as a person anointed with oil (ex.: Anointed One, from the Hebrew, Messiah).
....
"The carrying of the Tropaion is a depiction of the Trojan war refugee Aeneas who founded Rome which is the Julio-Claudian dynasty."
Although Aeneas is usually depicted as carrying his aged father, there is an image from Pompeii of him carrying a tropaeum.
"Crucify replaced the homophones translation of Latin "cremo" cremate, Greek "kremo" to hang/impale. Romans would impale heads on a pike. The Romans were not shy with their symbology of sex/violence."
The term "Crucify" (Latin
cruci figere) most certainly did not replace the two homophones,
cremo and κρεμῶ, although the latter, a derivation of κρεμάννυμι "suspend, hang, impale" was certainly expansive enough at the time of Caesar's funeral to include the concept of crucifixion, as practiced in the day, not necessarily as we understand it. The nailing of a wax effigy on a cross, or tropaion, would certainly add to the confusion of the two and this is what Francesco Carotta works with. [5]
"Caesar was cremated (cremo), and a wax effigy was hanged/nailed (kremo) on a Tropaion. People rubbed ashes from the pyre on their foreheads, because they seen him as divine...."
I do not know of people rubbing their ashes on their foreheads, but they certainly saw him as divine; Suetonius (
Divus Julius 85) notes there was a column erected in his honor, where people made sacrifices, made vows and settled disputes by swearing to Caesar.
"Does this scene look familiar? The evidence presented for crucifixion is a joke! Find bent nails detecting all the time. Only physical evidence for crucifixion is a single shim bone [sic!]
with a nail in it. Near me in the 50's there was found under a boulder a pair of skeleton hands in rusted iron cuffs from the 1700's. This one surprise find does not make it common."
Not necessarily, but the bone (actually a heel bone) with the nail in it, belonging to one
Yehohanan, does mean that there is evidence that Romans nailed convicted criminals' feet to poles. But of a Roman use of
crosses (cruces immissae) for suspending those to be executed
, on the other hand, there is simply no direct archaeological evidence. [6]
"The ancient Greeks would erect the Tropaion on the battle field. The Romans used it for public display, and humiliation in Rome for witness."
Used it for humiliation of whom? Certainly not the witnesses -- the victorious
imperator(s) hosting the triumph (parade) commemorating their victory would be angling for the witnesses' votes, should he (they) run for public office. But it would be the prisoners bound at the base of the tropaion in the midst of the procession, along with other captured war enemies, who would be humiliated by this display.
"It was sacreligious to desecrate this sacred symbol. Nike was the Greek version of Victoria. Depictions of deities with wings goes back to Sumeria."
True. The cross was a scared symbol -- before Christianity, too. It's evident in the ancient Egyptian symbol of the
Ankh, and in a depiction of the Sun from
ancient Babylon, as can clearly be seen below. In
this YouTube video is a certain Mr. Wayman's thoughts on pagan crosses.
"Gaul is where central Europe (France, Germany, etc.) is today. The ancient Romans looked upon these tribes as savages and uncivilized. The ancient Romans did not offer [their nobility] the same respect as other nobility."
Not all of Germany: Gaul included, as well as France, Southwest Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium and southern Holland. Bascially everything southwest of the Rhine to the Pyrenees.
"The Rebel Vercingetorix was responsible for 1000's of Roman Soldier deaths, and injuries. This man was a prime candidate for crucifixion.
"After 5 years in prison he was strangled after a triumph ceremony as custom. Do you still think crucifixion on a sacred symbol happened?"
Strangulation in prison after a Roman triumph ceremony was an ancient custom for disposing of commanders of conquered enemies. Not only
Vercingetorix, but others, including the Jewish rebel
Simon Bar-Giora was subjected to this sort of death.
"Imperial cult of Caesar deified Divus Iulius Christos. Julius's was effigy was nailed to a cross so crowd can observe stab wounds inflicted by senators. The daylight comet of 44 BCE during Julius's funeral games... [sentence peters out].
The Chinese document the comet of 44 BCE in their texts."
This moniker
Divus Iulius Christos detracts from the rest of the paragraph which has essentially been proven by Mr. Carotta, although the
History Channel and a tourist
SitSim (iPhone app) developed under Gunnar Liestøl, professor at the University of Oslo show the effigy tied to a cross (stake with beam). The wax image would certainly have been displayed in a more dignified manner, much as suggested by Mr. Carotta below:
|
Suggested Display of Wax Image of Julius Caesar
(Carotta.de) |
And this miniature tropaeum found in the Berlin Museum at Charlottenberg indicates the armor of a Caesar surmounted on a
crux immissa type cross, made from logs.
"The Julian Star a.k.a. Caesar's Comet symbol was later used by Emperor Constantine with the early Christogram Chi Rho in guise of Greek letters X & P. Comet is Greek for Kometes (star with long hairs). Medieval art depicts... [sentence peters out].
True.
The Comet of Julius Caesar appeared over the Ludi Victoriae Caesaris "Games of Caesar's Victory," a.k.a the funeral games for Julius Caesar on July 20th, 44 BCE and lasted for seven days. This was taken by the Romans as a sign of the apotheosis (deification) of Julius Caesar.
As far as Constantine adopting Caesar's Comet symbol and changing it to the familiar
Chi-Rho (or chrismon), I have not found any verification thereof. But we do know for a fact that it was Constantine who adopted this newer symbol and the only narratives for why he adopted it are Christian narratives that tell of Constantine seeing a cross above the sun.
"I know the image of crucifixion has been ingrained in the minds of society for 1,000's of years. I had trouble myself unwrapping my head from this."
That's because the popular imagery of crucifixion is usually as shown below. Note the great care the Romans allegedly took in building these three inlaid crosses.
|
Andrea Del Castango -- Crucifixion. |
Notes:
[1] From the Latin,
committo, "To bring together, join, combine, put together, connect, unite;" derived from
mitto, LSJ I. In Gen. "to cause to go, let go, send, send off, despatch," II. In partic., K. "To send, throw, hurl, cast, launch."
[2] Raymone E. Brown,
The Death of the Messiah, Vol. II p.948 "Another type of cross was formed if a notch was cut horizontally into the side of the standing pole at some distance from the top, and the crossbeam inserted into that, giving the shape of an elongated plus sign (... the
crux immissa).
[3] Francesco Carrotta and Arne Eickenberg, "
Orpheos Bakkikos / The Missing Cross." Originally published as: Carotta F with Eickenberg A. 2009. “Orfeo Báquico – La Cruz Desaparecida”, Isidorianum 18 (35), 179–217
[4] Francesco Carrotta, "
Jesus was Caesar – Prima Vista / Chapter I of the English edition." Originally published as: Francesco Carotta and Tommie Hendriks,
Jesus Was Caesar: On the Julian Origin of Christianity: An Investigative Report. Soesterberg, The Netherlands, Uitgeverij Aspekt b.v., 2005.
[5]
Ibid., Chapt. III -- "Crux", n. 195.
[6] Wikipedia,
Jehohanan. Under the section titled "Reappraisal, Zias & Sekeles, 1985" it is admitted that "The findings of Zias and Sekeles do not indicate a horizontal patibulum cross-beam was attached to the victim's crucifixion device. Jehohanan may have very well extended his arms upward on a
crux simplex (simple upright stake)."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehohanan Accessed 11-14-2015 4:06 PM CDT.